Trombocitopenia asociada a ceftarolina en combinación con daptomicina: a propósito de dos casos / Thrombocytopenia associated with ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin: report of two cases

Introducción: La trombocitopenia inducida por fármacos es un efecto adverso cuya incidencia es desconocida, pero que puede ser potencialmente severo. Pacientes y métodos: Se presentan los casos de dos pacientes con trombocitopenia asociada a ceftarolina y/o daptomicina utilizados en asociación en el tratamiento de endocarditis infecciosa por Staphylococcus aureus meticilin-resistente (SARM). Resultados: En los dos casos descritos se observó un descenso en el recuento de plaquetas durante el tratamiento combinado, continuando el efecto pese a la reducción de dosis y asociándose a ceftarolina por la secuencia temporal fármaco/efecto.Ambos casos fueron notificados al Servicio de Farmacovigilancia. La evaluación de causalidad de ceftarolina mediante el algoritmo de Karch Lasagna modificado por Naranjo et al. resultó como posible en primer caso y probable en el segundo.Conclusiones: Ante los dos casos descritos y otros recogidos en la revisión bibliográfica sobre el riesgo de trombocitopenia asociada a ceftarolina, se plantea la necesidad de realizar controles hematológicos, especialmente en pacientes con tratamientos prolongados y/o con dosis elevadas. Son necesarios estudios postautorización para evaluar la incidencia de efectos adversos poco frecuentes. (AU)

Introduction: Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is an adverse effect whose incidence is unknown, but which can be potentially severe. Patients and methods: The cases of two patients with thrombocytopenia associated with ceftaroline and/or daptomycin used in association in the treatment of infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are presented. Results: In the two cases described, a decrease in the platelet count is shown during the combined treatment, continuing the effect despite the dose reduction and being associated with ceftaroline due to the drug/effect temporal sequence. Both cases were notified to the Pharmacovigilance Service. The causality assessment of ceftaroline using the Karch Lasagna algorithm modified by Naranjo et al. was possible in the first case and probable in the second. Conclusions: Given the two cases described and others collected in the literature review on the risk of thrombocytopenia associated with ceftaroline, it is necessary to carry out haematological controls, especially in patients with prolonged treatments and/or with high doses. Post-authorization studies are necessary to assess the incidence of rare adverse effects. (AU)

[Utilization study in real clinical practice of ceftolozane/tazobactam vs aminoglycosides and/or colistin in the treatment of multirresistant or extremely resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa]. / Estudio de utilización en práctica clínica real de ceftolozano/tazobactam frente a aminoglucósidos y/o colistina en el tratamiento de Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative "real life" data on the effectiveness and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) versus other regimens (aminoglycosides/colistin/combination), in the treatment of multi-resistant (MDR) and extremely resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), are needed to establish positions. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study of patients with microbiological confirmation of MDR and XDR PA from July 2016 up to December 2018 in a tertiary hospital. Variables: age, sex, comorbidities, risk factors for multidrug resistance, variables related to infection, source of infection, microorganism and type of sample, antibiotic treatment, clinical cure, microbiological cure, recurrence, mortality on admission and 30 days post-discharge. Patients were classified according to received antibiotic treatment, C/T or aminoglycosides/colistin/combination. RESULTS: A total of 405 patients with PA MDR and XDR infection (73.1% men, mean age 63 ± 15 years) were studied. An 87.1% of PA XDR and a 12.9% MDR were observed. All patients received C/T as targeted therapy and in the aminoglycosides/colistin/combination group were 73.5%. Patients in the C/T group present worse prognostic factors: septic shock (30.0%) and catheterization (90.0%) (p<0.05). There were not statistically significant differences in microbiological cure (p=0.412), recurrence (p=0.880) and clinical cure (p=0.566). There were not statistically significant differences in mortality at admission (p=0.352) or at 30 days after discharge (p=0.231). A 17.2% of the patients with aminoglycosides/colistin/combination had acute kidney injury according to RIFLE criteria and 4.3% with C/T. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained suggest that there have been no differences in effectiveness (clinical or microbiological cure) in favour of C/T, although, in the period studied, it was used in most cases in multitreated patients with a worse prognosis. Randomized and prospective studies would be needed to establish an adequate positioning.

[Assessment of outcomes of implementing the Sepsis Code in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital]. / Evaluación de los resultados de la implantación del Código Sepsis en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital terciario.

INTRODUCTION: A Sepsis Code (CS) is a comprehensive multidisciplinary system which has the aim of optimising the identification and intervention times of patients with sepsis, as well as improving their monitoring and treatment adjustments in order to reduce their mortality. OBJECTIVES: To present the outcomes of the first year of introducing the CS in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted on all patients in whom the CS was activated in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital during the first year of implementation. The variables included: demographics, CS activation, comorbidities, focus of infection, microbiology, antibiotic treatment, and mortality. RESULTS: CS was activated in 555 patients, of which 302 (54.4%) had a definitive diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock on discharge from the emergency department. The degree of completion of the protocol variables was variable (41.8-95%).The large majority (86.1%) of the patients received antibiotics in the first hour, and in 76.2% blood cultures were collected prior to the antibiotic. Of the blood cultures performed, 13.3% of the isolated germs were multi-resistant and the level of contamination of blood cultures was 9.1%. All patients received empirical treatment and recommendations were followed in patients with septic shock in 28.3%. During follow-up, 64.4% the antibiotic treatment was targeted, and 39.5% received sequential therapy. In-hospital mortality was 32.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Areas of improvement in the completion of the variables, contamination of blood cultures, and empirical treatment received were detected, with the strong points being the early administration of the antibiotic and the collection of blood cultures.